Replicating the Obama campaign: the way forward for Labour says Alex Smith
A year on, I still feel that same excitement when I think about my time on the Obama campaign. Of course, that's partly because young people and old came together to work for an iconic candidate at what, even then, felt like an iconic moment in history.
And, yes, it's
because we were working toward the election of a charismatic leader,
anti-Iraq from the start and with good social democratic policies
against committed neo-liberal economists with neo-conservative social
instincts.
But what really stuck with me from those long, cold mornings on
Bed-Stuy subway platforms and outside polling stations near Coney
Island, and from across the swing states this time last year, was the
diversity of organisations and opinions that coalesced around a common
purpose.
Even after a tense and often divisive primary season which threatened
the Democratic Party with seemingly irreparable chasms, when it came to
the crunch people who disagreed on some issues but agreed in the most
part united and organised around a single cause: Blue Dogs with
liberals in New York; fiscal conservatives with social democrats in the
Potomac states; unionists with idealistic students in San Francisco.
Across a broad church of varying organisational structures and many
political differences, out of many, the Obama campaign was truly one.
Many have said it over the past year, but we in the Labour movement
still have a lot to learn from that campaign that put Barack Obama in
the White House - the campaign that has since seen the advancement of
some of the most progressive policies in American history: the Lily
Ledbetter Fair Pay Act; caps on bankers' bonuses; new tax cuts for the
working classes and increases on the wealthiest; resulting expanded
unemployment benefits; vast public sector and public service
investment; and the largest educational investment America has ever
known.
At times it took big leaps of faith to reach that powerful coalition, but the results are visible for all.
The Obama campaign was plural, it was grassroots and it was locally
autonomous. Conversely, it was also a very traditional campaign,
top-down and micro-managed from Chicago.
But that seeming contradiction was not a weakness; it was the
campaign's greatest strength. Only as a coalition built of liberals and
socialists, federalists and democrats, north and south, east and west,
was Obama able to build such a powerful, election-winning movement,
unparalleled in modern political history. Success was the result of a
combination of innovative thinking, pragmatic solutions and genuinely
joined-up campaigning.
Only that togetherness meant that when the chips were down, and when
the right-wing attacks were plentiful, the broad left was able to come
together like never before, on blogs, at rallies and in local campaigns.
At a time of such difficulty for the Labour party, it is imperative
that we who believe in honest social democratic solutions our own
social ills find a way to do the same: to find compromise where we may
differ, and to work together as one.
So while we iron out the policies for the manifesto that will take
Labour into the first post-recession election, discussion is crucial;
differences must be debated and even celebrated - but never accentuated.
Intellectually, that means opening up new conversations and unexpected
alliances that will result in the type of policy and the style of
campaigning we can all be proud of.
Organisationally, it means pooling techniques and ideas, but also
sharing resources. Reading Renegade, it's very clear that as soon as
the primary season was over, old habits died - if not easy then at
least quickly. As soon as the nomination was secured, the Obama
campaign harnessed Hillary Clinton's email list to full affect and
discussions and public rallies were frequently held by and between
those who had previously been opponents.
We in the Labour movement must do the same, beginning now. Old
disagreements must be put aside for the next six months and whatever
resources and tools of connection we possess should be integrated and
deployed as one.
LabourList has amassed a database of thousands of email addresses and
readers, as have Compass and others. Each can now begin to campaign not
as single voices competing with each other, but as a united force in
order to best connect people and support each other.
And once we arrive at our manifesto document and have shared our ideas
for integrated and collective campaigns, we must all in the Labour
movement - unions, campaign groups, blogs, think tanks and CLPs - fight
with whatever we have for that new Labour government.
Alex Smith is editor of LabourList.org
Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.
To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.











Comments
on 10 November 2009, 5:46:17 PM
"I would respectfully suggest that nobody should reply to Sane."
You moan and stamp your feet and say you are going home and then when you're called out on it, you proceed to stamp your feet still further.
Get with Lee, Dugsie and Paul. They've been at it hammer and tong all day today.
Mind you, if I were sent to Coventry by Compass, according to your own opinion about the relevance of Compass, it would be no bad thing.
Are you even being serious? Are you a Tory? Are you a Blue Labourite? You can't be op-ed, designed to get the argument going, as your message seems to be very narrow and doesn't, in the end, go very far.
on 10 November 2009, 5:37:17 PM
on 10 November 2009, 3:14:57 AM
*****************************************************************
There is no doubt about the racist right-wing backlash in the US since Obama was elected. However, Obama changed his position radically on many issues, and on health care, he was a powerful advocate for a full public national health system until he began to run for the Presidency. So he shares the blame, I'm afraid
on 09 November 2009, 4:53:02 PM
"Sane thank you for your intelligent and compassionate comments!
I have not left the party . It was the party which left me. I am sorry taht you want to spend your time re-arrangign the deckchairs. I was looking forward to working with you and others to prepare the inevitable funeral pyre after the inevitable defeat. But this time it will be terminal. Nothing can be done about it. It is just the way it is.
It is now less than 200 days to go."
A lot of you seem to know each other. Do any of you know this character personally or have a clue as to what precisely it is they are doing?
on 09 November 2009, 3:34:41 PM
I have not left the party . It was the party which left me. I am sorry taht you want to spend your time re-arrangign the deckchairs. I was looking forward to working with you and others to prepare the inevitable funeral pyre after the inevitable defeat. But this time it will be terminal. Nothing can be done about it. It is just the way it is.
It is now less than 200 days to go.
on 09 November 2009, 1:27:03 PM
"Article is an example of pathologocal recollection. All he recalls is the fun of fooling voters into believing that they were voting for an anti-war candidate with a liberal agenda. I suppose the ethics of these things do not matter to Mr Smith. As long as they believe your lies and you win, that's a great outcome. Is Mr Smith suggesting that Labour take the same types of false positions and make the same false promises as Obama ? Pity the British are not as gullible as Americans.
The article also ignores the importance of mainstream corporate support and the multi-million dollar Madison Avenue campaign that sold Obama as the messiah. He was, in many ways, elected just as Presidents before have been elected, and with the same broken promises."
Obama in fact made Afghanistan his own during the campaigning. Perhaps he thought that with Iraq tidied up (from the American perspective), Afghanistan could be made much more straightforward. Or, maybe he thought that to win a presidential election, he needed at least one war, so he chose Afghanistan.
I think with the sort of healthcare bill Obama wanted, as opposed to any his apparent mishandling of the situation has left him with, was a fair reflection of a liberal man (in American terms). I don't think he can be held responsible for Republican nuttiness, both in Washington and without. He might be responsible for not forseeing it though and for not having a plan to deal with it.
He again has been caught out by Guantanamo and by his perhaps misguided belief that he could in any way govern in a bipartisan manner. The closing of Guantanamo is being conducted as much to prevent embarrassment to the Republicans as for anything else. Perhaps Obama has felt himself, unconsciously, as though he were trespassing on the White House lawn. Perhaps he hoped that the Republicans would show themselves up and so in the end, do his job for him. He would not have understood, if this were the case, of how the Republican nuttiness is like a virus in the body: It can spread.
It's funny also, on Guardian and Compass talk boards, the number of people who are conspicuously unhappy that Obama is not Jesus or Lenin.
on 09 November 2009, 12:08:57 PM
on 09 November 2009, 11:22:02 AM
The article also ignores the importance of mainstream corporate support and the multi-million dollar Madison Avenue campaign that sold Obama as the messiah. He was, in many ways, elected just as Presidents before have been elected, and with the same broken promises.
on 08 November 2009, 12:04:37 PM
"Sane You refer to personal attacks as 'pertinent'. Do you actually know what the word means? Get a life."
You have a lot of "get yer things, we're off" type comments, that serve to rather short-cut the debate.
If you read me properly, you will see that I make a number of pertinent points, whilst also pointing out in quite blunt terms, how tedious you can be in sulk and go-home mode.
on 07 November 2009, 10:08:55 AM
on 06 November 2009, 8:44:31 PM
I make a number of pertinent points, i take it you cannot answer them.
You may not name an individual or call them out, but your posts can be very dismissive.
on 06 November 2009, 3:16:09 PM
on 05 November 2009, 5:56:34 PM
"If there are so many progressives in America then why does it lack an organised LEft or indeed any LEft grouping?
Yes there were many single donations to the Obama campaign but the total amount was dominated by corporate donations."
Are you being purposely obtuse? Is it fun? Nobody is talking about a Left movement in American apart from you. You are on your own on that point, don't get lonely out there. The point is merely about the US Election. In fact, the total amount of individual donations was a sign of good support of Obama and for the change at that point people were talking about, regardless of where the corporations put their money.
Now, Obama seems not to have been ready for the political battles of President. He would never have been Left wing in any European sense. Well done for spotting that. But we do all know that America is to the Right of Europe. It is what Obama could achieve in that context.
But you are just sat at the back of the class, chewing gum and issuing forth with what you think are telling comments. We know it all, so save the effort.
on 05 November 2009, 5:28:16 PM
I thought the funniest part was where he spoke of "the broad left" of American politics ROFL
on 05 November 2009, 3:49:32 PM
Yes there were many single donations to the Obama campaign but the total amount was dominated by corporate donations.
on 04 November 2009, 11:50:33 PM
"The part you are missing is that Labour does not have an iconic charismatic leader that inspires people to get out in the first place. That is the problem. You can use the technology, use the methods, but people are tired of Labour, there is nothing Labour can say to positively inspire people, and no one in Labour's ranks, much less its leader, who can inspire them. All you can say is that the Tories are worse and people should vote for Labour out of fear. 1) that won't work to get out the vote, 2) Labour in government has proven as bad as Tories previously. Even if you disagree, people have that view and you aren't the lot to convince them otherwise. You are discredited. It is in fact the Tories or the Liberals who can best use Obama's campaign methods. Remember Obama kicked out an unpopular incumbent government, i.e. like you"
To wake you up: The Tories do not have anybody remotely like Obama; and, as for the Lib-Dems, like 'em, or loathe 'em, they haven't anything in charisma like Obama either.
The Obama campaign was very positive. The Tories just depend upon Blue Labour unpopularity. People do not love the Tories and do not expect to love the Tories and, i imagine, do not wish to love the Tories. People are disillusioned now with Obama owing partly to how much they did want to love him.
To answer Angela@ Obama's failure has probably been in not preparing for government. They knew how the Republican attack dogs went after Clinton, they know how whipped up the mad Republicans are, but they did not prepare for it. All of that organisation and good feeling that went into electing Obama - so many single-non-corporate donations, should have been continued to fight for his program. There has also been a problem in the fact that the Democrats need their heads bashing. If they think they have the luxury of being divided themselves, they are mad.
No, Obama is not perfect, not Jesus and not Lenin - funny: nobody is and they're all dead. But I have a feeling that Obama is further Left than being US President allows you to be. He has made, if he has, tactical mistakes. But in his stimulus package and his addressing the bonus issue, however imperfectly, he has shown himself streets ahead of Blue Labour.
You only ever come on here to gripe and say: The ship's sinking, the ship's sinking, we're all going down, and good riddance for that.
on 04 November 2009, 11:19:21 PM
Soon they'll be phoning for a donation and I'll be telling them how much I hate New Labour, just like last time. Yes, they'll say, we feel like that too, but at a time like this we've all got to stand together. We don't want the Tories getting in, that will be a lot worse.I'll agree and scrabble around for an OAP's mite, just like last time.They'll assure me that we can have a really good consultation about policy after we've won another general election and I'll disbelieve them, just like last time.
Except, I doubt that it will be quite like last time, this time.
on 04 November 2009, 10:06:44 PM
Don't sell Labour short. What about the swivle-eyed Mentalone? If this government's economic mismanagement hadn't brought sterling so low in the first place and made it impossible, and if I'm any judge of character, Mentalone would really inspire most of the people who could afford it to get the hell out of the country faster than a dynamite Catherine Wheel.
on 04 November 2009, 5:46:50 PM
on 04 November 2009, 2:57:42 PM
American politics and political culture are completely different. There are some attractive features but they are outweighed by extremely unattractive features. TO begin with this 'coalition' was very dependent on corporate finance as all American elections are.
The Obama moment was media made and lacks substance. Britain requies somethign more substantial than an artificai8lly contrived 'moment'.
Leave a comment