09/07/10 Lessons from Deepwater Horizon 23/06/10 A New Hope: full YouTube coverage now available 02/06/10 Latest Thinkpiece published 26/05/10 A New Hope for Labour: attend the Leaders' Debate 19/05/10 A New Hope: Caroline Lucas MP confirms to speak‏

Compass poll

Latest comments
  • Dianne deserves support not so much because of what she is, but because of what she isn't....
    Dugsie (Yorks)
  • Jonathan: I dont actually disagree with your verdict about Abbott....
    Lee (Highlands)
  • Paul: I hope you dont get angry, but I really think you are treating what Rutherford says far too se...
    Lee (Highlands)
  • Lee - she's got the support of just 2 Trade Unions and 20 CLP's - she has very little support in the...
    Jonathon Hawkes
  • Lewis, I am pleased that your idealism about Labour has dimmed somewhat....
    Paul McLean (Leeds)

Education and the Good Society Statement

Join Compass

Mailing list

Events

High Pay Commission

How to live in the 21st Century

News filter

Replicating the Obama campaign: the way forward for Labour says Alex Smith

Wednesday, November 04 2009

A year on, I still feel that same excitement when I think about my time on the Obama campaign. Of course, that's partly because young people and old came together to work for an iconic candidate at what, even then, felt like an iconic moment in history.

And, yes, it's because we were working toward the election of a charismatic leader, anti-Iraq from the start and with good social democratic policies against committed neo-liberal economists with neo-conservative social instincts.

But what really stuck with me from those long, cold mornings on Bed-Stuy subway platforms and outside polling stations near Coney Island, and from across the swing states this time last year, was the diversity of organisations and opinions that coalesced around a common purpose.

Even after a tense and often divisive primary season which threatened the Democratic Party with seemingly irreparable chasms, when it came to the crunch people who disagreed on some issues but agreed in the most part united and organised around a single cause: Blue Dogs with liberals in New York; fiscal conservatives with social democrats in the Potomac states; unionists with idealistic students in San Francisco.

Across a broad church of varying organisational structures and many political differences, out of many, the Obama campaign was truly one.

Many have said it over the past year, but we in the Labour movement still have a lot to learn from that campaign that put Barack Obama in the White House - the campaign that has since seen the advancement of some of the most progressive policies in American history: the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act; caps on bankers' bonuses; new tax cuts for the working classes and increases on the wealthiest; resulting expanded unemployment benefits; vast public sector and public service investment; and the largest educational investment America has ever known.

At times it took big leaps of faith to reach that powerful coalition, but the results are visible for all.

The Obama campaign was plural, it was grassroots and it was locally autonomous. Conversely, it was also a very traditional campaign, top-down and micro-managed from Chicago.

But that seeming contradiction was not a weakness; it was the campaign's greatest strength. Only as a coalition built of liberals and socialists, federalists and democrats, north and south, east and west, was Obama able to build such a powerful, election-winning movement, unparalleled in modern political history. Success was the result of a combination of innovative thinking, pragmatic solutions and genuinely joined-up campaigning.

Only that togetherness meant that when the chips were down, and when the right-wing attacks were plentiful, the broad left was able to come together like never before, on blogs, at rallies and in local campaigns.

At a time of such difficulty for the Labour party, it is imperative that we who believe in honest social democratic solutions our own social ills find a way to do the same: to find compromise where we may differ, and to work together as one.

So while we iron out the policies for the manifesto that will take Labour into the first post-recession election, discussion is crucial; differences must be debated and even celebrated - but never accentuated.

Intellectually, that means opening up new conversations and unexpected alliances that will result in the type of policy and the style of campaigning we can all be proud of.

Organisationally, it means pooling techniques and ideas, but also sharing resources. Reading Renegade, it's very clear that as soon as the primary season was over, old habits died - if not easy then at least quickly. As soon as the nomination was secured, the Obama campaign harnessed Hillary Clinton's email list to full affect and discussions and public rallies were frequently held by and between those who had previously been opponents.

We in the Labour movement must do the same, beginning now. Old disagreements must be put aside for the next six months and whatever resources and tools of connection we possess should be integrated and deployed as one.

LabourList has amassed a database of thousands of email addresses and readers, as have Compass and others. Each can now begin to campaign not as single voices competing with each other, but as a united force in order to best connect people and support each other.

And once we arrive at our manifesto document and have shared our ideas for integrated and collective campaigns, we must all in the Labour movement - unions, campaign groups, blogs, think tanks and CLPs - fight with whatever we have for that new Labour government.

Alex Smith is editor of LabourList.org

Share using AddThis AddThis

Want to write an article like this? If you’re a Compass member you can submit your own articles and start your own debates on the Compass debates member’s section, an autonomous space for our members to initiate debate and discuss ideas.

To keep updated on the latest Compass news, please join our mailing list.

Comments

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 20 of 20
Posted by Sane 
on 10 November 2009, 5:46:17 PM
Pinter:
"I would respectfully suggest that nobody should reply to Sane."

You moan and stamp your feet and say you are going home and then when you're called out on it, you proceed to stamp your feet still further.

Get with Lee, Dugsie and Paul. They've been at it hammer and tong all day today.

Mind you, if I were sent to Coventry by Compass, according to your own opinion about the relevance of Compass, it would be no bad thing.

Are you even being serious? Are you a Tory? Are you a Blue Labourite? You can't be op-ed, designed to get the argument going, as your message seems to be very narrow and doesn't, in the end, go very far.
Posted by angela pinter 
on 10 November 2009, 5:37:17 PM
I would respectfully suggest that nobody should reply to Sane.
Posted by Lee (Highlands)
on 10 November 2009, 3:14:57 AM
Sane: I think with the sort of healthcare bill Obama wanted, as opposed to any his apparent mishandling of the situation has left him with, was a fair reflection of a liberal man (in American terms).
*****************************************************************
There is no doubt about the racist right-wing backlash in the US since Obama was elected. However, Obama changed his position radically on many issues, and on health care, he was a powerful advocate for a full public national health system until he began to run for the Presidency. So he shares the blame, I'm afraid
Posted by Sane 
on 09 November 2009, 4:53:02 PM
Pinter:
"Sane thank you for your intelligent and compassionate comments!
I have not left the party . It was the party which left me. I am sorry taht you want to spend your time re-arrangign the deckchairs. I was looking forward to working with you and others to prepare the inevitable funeral pyre after the inevitable defeat. But this time it will be terminal. Nothing can be done about it. It is just the way it is.
It is now less than 200 days to go."

A lot of you seem to know each other. Do any of you know this character personally or have a clue as to what precisely it is they are doing?
Posted by angela pinter 
on 09 November 2009, 3:34:41 PM
Sane thank you for your intelligent and compassionate comments!
I have not left the party . It was the party which left me. I am sorry taht you want to spend your time re-arrangign the deckchairs. I was looking forward to working with you and others to prepare the inevitable funeral pyre after the inevitable defeat. But this time it will be terminal. Nothing can be done about it. It is just the way it is.
It is now less than 200 days to go.
Posted by Sane 
on 09 November 2009, 1:27:03 PM
Lee:
"Article is an example of pathologocal recollection. All he recalls is the fun of fooling voters into believing that they were voting for an anti-war candidate with a liberal agenda. I suppose the ethics of these things do not matter to Mr Smith. As long as they believe your lies and you win, that's a great outcome. Is Mr Smith suggesting that Labour take the same types of false positions and make the same false promises as Obama ? Pity the British are not as gullible as Americans.

The article also ignores the importance of mainstream corporate support and the multi-million dollar Madison Avenue campaign that sold Obama as the messiah. He was, in many ways, elected just as Presidents before have been elected, and with the same broken promises."

Obama in fact made Afghanistan his own during the campaigning. Perhaps he thought that with Iraq tidied up (from the American perspective), Afghanistan could be made much more straightforward. Or, maybe he thought that to win a presidential election, he needed at least one war, so he chose Afghanistan.

I think with the sort of healthcare bill Obama wanted, as opposed to any his apparent mishandling of the situation has left him with, was a fair reflection of a liberal man (in American terms). I don't think he can be held responsible for Republican nuttiness, both in Washington and without. He might be responsible for not forseeing it though and for not having a plan to deal with it.

He again has been caught out by Guantanamo and by his perhaps misguided belief that he could in any way govern in a bipartisan manner. The closing of Guantanamo is being conducted as much to prevent embarrassment to the Republicans as for anything else. Perhaps Obama has felt himself, unconsciously, as though he were trespassing on the White House lawn. Perhaps he hoped that the Republicans would show themselves up and so in the end, do his job for him. He would not have understood, if this were the case, of how the Republican nuttiness is like a virus in the body: It can spread.

It's funny also, on Guardian and Compass talk boards, the number of people who are conspicuously unhappy that Obama is not Jesus or Lenin.
Posted by Dugsie (Yorks)
on 09 November 2009, 12:08:57 PM
A good piece by Pilger on Breaking the Australian Silence.You'll know where to find it.
Posted by Lee (Highlands)
on 09 November 2009, 11:22:02 AM
Article is an example of pathologocal recollection. All he recalls is the fun of fooling voters into believing that they were voting for an anti-war candidate with a liberal agenda. I suppose the ethics of these things do not matter to Mr Smith. As long as they believe your lies and you win, that's a great outcome. Is Mr Smith suggesting that Labour take the same types of false positions and make the same false promises as Obama ? Pity the British are not as gullible as Americans.

The article also ignores the importance of mainstream corporate support and the multi-million dollar Madison Avenue campaign that sold Obama as the messiah. He was, in many ways, elected just as Presidents before have been elected, and with the same broken promises.
Posted by Sane 
on 08 November 2009, 12:04:37 PM
Pinter
"Sane You refer to personal attacks as 'pertinent'. Do you actually know what the word means? Get a life."

You have a lot of "get yer things, we're off" type comments, that serve to rather short-cut the debate.

If you read me properly, you will see that I make a number of pertinent points, whilst also pointing out in quite blunt terms, how tedious you can be in sulk and go-home mode.
Posted by angela pinter 
on 07 November 2009, 10:08:55 AM
Sane You refer to personal attacks as 'pertinent'. Do you actually know what the word means? Get a life.
Posted by Sane 
on 06 November 2009, 8:44:31 PM
Pinter: "Sane I do not propose to sink to your level."

I make a number of pertinent points, i take it you cannot answer them.

You may not name an individual or call them out, but your posts can be very dismissive.
Posted by angela pinter 
on 06 November 2009, 3:16:09 PM
Sane I do not propose to sink to your level.
Posted by Sane 
on 05 November 2009, 5:56:34 PM
Pinter:
"If there are so many progressives in America then why does it lack an organised LEft or indeed any LEft grouping?
Yes there were many single donations to the Obama campaign but the total amount was dominated by corporate donations."

Are you being purposely obtuse? Is it fun? Nobody is talking about a Left movement in American apart from you. You are on your own on that point, don't get lonely out there. The point is merely about the US Election. In fact, the total amount of individual donations was a sign of good support of Obama and for the change at that point people were talking about, regardless of where the corporations put their money.

Now, Obama seems not to have been ready for the political battles of President. He would never have been Left wing in any European sense. Well done for spotting that. But we do all know that America is to the Right of Europe. It is what Obama could achieve in that context.

But you are just sat at the back of the class, chewing gum and issuing forth with what you think are telling comments. We know it all, so save the effort.
Posted by Martyn Rosen 
on 05 November 2009, 5:28:16 PM
That's the biggest load of claptrap I've read on Compass since Alex Smith's last effort :-)))))

I thought the funniest part was where he spoke of "the broad left" of American politics ROFL
Posted by angela pinter 
on 05 November 2009, 3:49:32 PM
If there are so many progressives in America then why does it lack an organised LEft or indeed any LEft grouping?
Yes there were many single donations to the Obama campaign but the total amount was dominated by corporate donations.
Posted by Sane 
on 04 November 2009, 11:50:33 PM
Raleigh
"The part you are missing is that Labour does not have an iconic charismatic leader that inspires people to get out in the first place. That is the problem. You can use the technology, use the methods, but people are tired of Labour, there is nothing Labour can say to positively inspire people, and no one in Labour's ranks, much less its leader, who can inspire them. All you can say is that the Tories are worse and people should vote for Labour out of fear. 1) that won't work to get out the vote, 2) Labour in government has proven as bad as Tories previously. Even if you disagree, people have that view and you aren't the lot to convince them otherwise. You are discredited. It is in fact the Tories or the Liberals who can best use Obama's campaign methods. Remember Obama kicked out an unpopular incumbent government, i.e. like you"

To wake you up: The Tories do not have anybody remotely like Obama; and, as for the Lib-Dems, like 'em, or loathe 'em, they haven't anything in charisma like Obama either.

The Obama campaign was very positive. The Tories just depend upon Blue Labour unpopularity. People do not love the Tories and do not expect to love the Tories and, i imagine, do not wish to love the Tories. People are disillusioned now with Obama owing partly to how much they did want to love him.

To answer Angela@ Obama's failure has probably been in not preparing for government. They knew how the Republican attack dogs went after Clinton, they know how whipped up the mad Republicans are, but they did not prepare for it. All of that organisation and good feeling that went into electing Obama - so many single-non-corporate donations, should have been continued to fight for his program. There has also been a problem in the fact that the Democrats need their heads bashing. If they think they have the luxury of being divided themselves, they are mad.

No, Obama is not perfect, not Jesus and not Lenin - funny: nobody is and they're all dead. But I have a feeling that Obama is further Left than being US President allows you to be. He has made, if he has, tactical mistakes. But in his stimulus package and his addressing the bonus issue, however imperfectly, he has shown himself streets ahead of Blue Labour.

You only ever come on here to gripe and say: The ship's sinking, the ship's sinking, we're all going down, and good riddance for that.
Posted by Dugsie (Yorks)
on 04 November 2009, 11:19:21 PM
The closer it gets to a general election, the more they talk like this.

Soon they'll be phoning for a donation and I'll be telling them how much I hate New Labour, just like last time. Yes, they'll say, we feel like that too, but at a time like this we've all got to stand together. We don't want the Tories getting in, that will be a lot worse.I'll agree and scrabble around for an OAP's mite, just like last time.They'll assure me that we can have a really good consultation about policy after we've won another general election and I'll disbelieve them, just like last time.

Except, I doubt that it will be quite like last time, this time.
Posted by Salfordgal (London)
on 04 November 2009, 10:06:44 PM
"The part you are missing is that Labour does not have an iconic charismatic leader that inspires people to get out in the first place"

Don't sell Labour short. What about the swivle-eyed Mentalone? If this government's economic mismanagement hadn't brought sterling so low in the first place and made it impossible, and if I'm any judge of character, Mentalone would really inspire most of the people who could afford it to get the hell out of the country faster than a dynamite Catherine Wheel.
Posted by Raleigh (London)
on 04 November 2009, 5:46:50 PM
The part you are missing is that Labour does not have an iconic charismatic leader that inspires people to get out in the first place. That is the problem. You can use the technology, use the methods, but people are tired of Labour, there is nothing Labour can say to positively inspire people, and no one in Labour's ranks, much less its leader, who can inspire them. All you can say is that the Tories are worse and people should vote for Labour out of fear. 1) that won't work to get out the vote, 2) Labour in government has proven as bad as Tories previously. Even if you disagree, people have that view and you aren't the lot to convince them otherwise. You are discredited. It is in fact the Tories or the Liberals who can best use Obama's campaign methods. Remember Obama kicked out an unpopular incumbent government, i.e. like you
Posted by angela pinter 
on 04 November 2009, 2:57:42 PM
Is this fantasy? That Obama is seen as a 'progressive' is an indication of how detached from reality this article is.
American politics and political culture are completely different. There are some attractive features but they are outweighed by extremely unattractive features. TO begin with this 'coalition' was very dependent on corporate finance as all American elections are.
The Obama moment was media made and lacks substance. Britain requies somethign more substantial than an artificai8lly contrived 'moment'.

  • ««
  • «
  • »
  • »»
1 to 20 of 20

 

Leave a comment

About you










Your comment

Please do not use HTML tags in your comment as they will be displayed as normal text.

We take no responsibility for the content of comments posted on this website, which represent the views of their authors alone.

Please enter the two words in the image below. This is an anti-spam measure designed to prove that you are a human, not a computer.